From: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ebaa1a8a7eb1c9370b33846f07c3b91212355869dfb91f4d3e1f7055fca6c603
Message ID: <9601290442.AA23563@cti02.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-29 05:06:29 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:06:29 +0800
From: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:06:29 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Downsizing the NSA
Message-ID: <9601290442.AA23563@cti02.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Timothy C. May wrote:
>AT&T is downsizing, IBM downsized a while back, so why couldn't the NSA
>just do the right thing: admit that the Soviet threat is no more,
>congratulate the victors, and downsize by 20,000 employees?
Your post is very interesting. I would like to add to it in the form of a question:
Q) What are the factors, in what context did AT&T and IBM and many other big companies downsize? Or, in other words: What are the ultimate contextual causes of the downsizing?
Regards to Cypherpunks from a new guy on the mailing list.
JFA
Return to January 1996
Return to “jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))”
1996-01-29 (Mon, 29 Jan 1996 13:06:29 +0800) - Re: Downsizing the NSA - jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))