From: “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>
To: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
Message Hash: f09f3c557f1c9b26934f68c096b4f7afb6af104095daddba5d4294cfabf1c3a2
Message ID: <v02140a0dad14ebf68585@[165.254.158.230]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-07 08:09:55 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 16:09:55 +0800
From: "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9001@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 16:09:55 +0800
To: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Undeliverable: Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
Message-ID: <v02140a0dad14ebf68585@[165.254.158.230]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:25 1/6/96, blanc wrote:
>From: Steve14571@aol.com
>
>Something else I want to know... Why is my mail going through microsoft.com?
>...........................................................................
>............................
>
>There is an email 'alias' at Microsoft which was subscribed to the cpunk
>list, to receive and distribute the cpunk list to members of that alias.
>
>A new beta version of Exchange is being used on a test basis by some
>departments (apparently all of the cpunks at MS are using it), and the
>programmers recently encountered a "little complication" (to use a phrase
>from the movie 'Brazil'). I'm told that the problems were corrected, but
>that now the spoolers are releasing messages which were backed up while
>mail delivery was put on hold. I hate to agree with Timothy C. May, but
>it is probably best to "use technology " to deal with it for a day or so.
>
> ..
>Blanc
I had a bounce from another list (<corp-welfare@ursus.jun.alaska.edu>) so
it is not only cypherpunks which is having the problem.
Return to January 1996
Return to ““Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>”
1996-01-07 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 16:09:55 +0800) - Re: FW: Undeliverable: Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet - “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>