From: “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: f1795fb16cffbd88a9f9dfbad8e994c485fe1d40f921caf85fc2969a1721dc7b
Message ID: <199601062000.OAA20579@cdale1.midwest.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-06 20:11:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 04:11:41 +0800
From: "David E. Smith" <dsmith@midwest.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 04:11:41 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Revoking Old Lost Keys
Message-ID: <199601062000.OAA20579@cdale1.midwest.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:11 AM 1/6/96 -0800, tcmay@got.net wrote:
>If one can safely and securely store a revocation certificate for later
>use, why not just store the much shorter passphrase?
If the security of the safely-stored passphrase is violated, a lot of
trouble can be caused. There's not nearly as much that can be done with
a stored revocation certificate.
dave
---
Sorry for any delayed replies, but business trips are so seldom announced.
David E. Smith, dsmith@midwest.net, PGP ID 0x92732139
Return to January 1996
Return to ““David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>”
1996-01-06 (Sun, 7 Jan 1996 04:11:41 +0800) - Re: Revoking Old Lost Keys - “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>