From: “Michael Peponis” <mianigand@unique.outlook.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f66d4fed34230de04be4c86bc01c141d9b902146516b0e0790c60cf33ee1ca0e
Message ID: <199601270633.AAA09641@unique.outlook.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-27 06:53:54 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:53:54 +0800
From: "Michael Peponis" <mianigand@unique.outlook.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 14:53:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Open NNTP servers and logging
Message-ID: <199601270633.AAA09641@unique.outlook.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 26 Jan 96 at 21:11, Stephen Albert wrote:
> A little while back there were some very helpful posts about getting started
> wit open NNTP servers. Since my regular site runs kinda slow in the news
> department I've been having fun poking around and seeing about getting more
> current.
>
> Then it dawned on me. People keep logs. Presumably routine logging would
> point right back at my ISP, and from there it'd be not too hard to pin down me
> specifically. No, I don't think anyone is particularly *likely* to do that,
> but why take chances?
>
> So...anyone know of open NNTP servers that *don't* keep logs? Or some other
> way around the problem?
Well, as bad as the lack of anonymity may be, NNTP server logs serve a very
usefull purpose, ie finding and eliminating trolls and spammers.
Unfortunatly, I would have to go logs given the state of UseNet.
Why not just read from the open server, and post anonyomously using anonymous
remailers and News-to-Mail Gateways?
Regards,
Michael Peponis
PGP Key Avalible form MIT Key Server,or via finger
Return to January 1996
Return to ““Michael Peponis” <mianigand@unique.outlook.net>”