From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Message Hash: ffe8b24830774457fa9b0708b6f76e0f064624c541e8c15815164f5fac248f67
Message ID: <v02120d07ad3473b8d31f@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 04:19:29 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:19:29 +0800
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:19:29 +0800
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes
Message-ID: <v02120d07ad3473b8d31f@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 19:19 1/30/96, Rich Salz wrote:
>>I find this very interesting. RSA prohibits its licencees from using RSA
>>software with truly secure keylenghts.
>
>Hunh? I could find no mention of keylength or keysize in the RSAREF
>documents I had around. I'm at home now, but I also recall no mention
>of keysize or keylength in the license OSF has, either.
So from who did Lotus license RC4?
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
Return to January 1996
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1996-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:19:29 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)