1996-02-12 - Re: “Rights”

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: ecarp@netcom.com
Message Hash: 006085aa828196717bdb27d0c07cbd7146101fb3117aa3a9944c20f15ad2135f
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960212041306.008201e0@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-12 21:40:43 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 05:40:43 +0800

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 05:40:43 +0800
To: ecarp@netcom.com
Subject: Re: "Rights"
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960212041306.008201e0@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:15 AM 2/10/96 -0600, Ed Carp wrote:
>> Remedy exists. If you do not like the rules at one site, choose another. In
>
>What happens when there *is* no remedy, when there are no other sites to 
>go to, when there are no employers who would refrain from violating an 
>employee's privacy?  What then?

Ed, there are hardly likely to be much of a reduction in ISPs from the
current 7K.  Hard for an employer to track your use if you switch to a radio
modem after booting your machine without the network drivers to cut off
eavesdropping.

DCF






Thread