From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: 05f3083acd312aa5f11a470252b29b779ec8ee8e76956a74477bd3efa360a579
Message ID: <QQadzq22386.199602220941@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-22 09:45:12 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:45:12 +0800
From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:45:12 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQadzq22386.199602220941@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I'm sufficiently impressed with the arguments against name credentials
>that Carl Ellison has made that I'm looking seriously into systems
>that don't do any sort of conventional certificate binding at all...
... and I bet, Wei Dai's contentions to the contrary, that they'll be
*cheaper* to use than those which do certificate binding, all other things
being equal.
Cheers,
Bob Hettinga
-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com)
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"Reality is not optional." --Thomas Sowell
The e$ Home Page: http://thumper.vmeng.com/pub/rah/
Return to February 1996
Return to “owner-cypherpunks@toad.com”
1996-02-22 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 17:45:12 +0800) - No Subject - owner-cypherpunks@toad.com