1996-02-19 - Re: Risks of a style anonymizer?

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Message Hash: 08622767a27358686b92868efa37244972cb1c01a0f06a78bcaaad1d88c888eb
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960219010911.7650E-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <199602172305.SAA23887@bb.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-19 07:06:20 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:06:20 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:06:20 +0800
To: Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Subject: Re: Risks of a style anonymizer?
In-Reply-To: <199602172305.SAA23887@bb.hks.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960219010911.7650E-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


When did it become the style to have a clause, a colon, and another 
clause as the title of things? This seems to be universal in govt and 
university and highbrow blue-paper reports nowadays!

<<Perry Metzger off-topic complaint included by reference>>

Alan Horowitz
alanh@norfolk.infi.net

Thread

• Return to February 1996

• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”

• Return to “Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>”

• 1996-02-17 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 07:55:50 +0800) - Risks of a style anonymizer? - Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
  • 1996-02-19 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:06:20 +0800) - Re: Risks of a style anonymizer? - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>