From: Ray Arachelian <sunder@dorsai.dorsai.org>
To: Tony Iannotti <tony@secapl.com>
Message Hash: 0bebbe54917e25602e2edbf89b248621219d87de49d3e7878cb1ba36445d9549
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960202104319.14626B-100000@dorsai>
Reply To: <Pine.A32.3.91.960202071529.72228B-100000@fred.secapl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-02 16:23:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 00:23:22 +0800
From: Ray Arachelian <sunder@dorsai.dorsai.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 00:23:22 +0800
To: Tony Iannotti <tony@secapl.com>
Subject: Re: RC2 Source Code - Legal Warning from RSADSI
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91.960202071529.72228B-100000@fred.secapl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960202104319.14626B-100000@dorsai>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2 Feb 1996, Tony Iannotti wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Rich Salz wrote:
>
> > At any rate, I'll stop my comparison of the distributed RC2 and the
> > licensed RC2 since RSA's done it for us. :)
>
> What if it's just a ruse by them to ID it as RC2? They could have even
> released a bogus version themselves, and then sent up a hue and cry....
There's an easy test.. set up the real RC2 to encrypt data and have this
one decrypt it, then reverse the two, use different keys, etc... a few
thousand rounds should give a strong indication if this is the true RC2.
It doesn't mean that it wasn't rigged to produce weak keys and such,
however a closer analysis of the source will point that out. :)
==========================================================================
+ ^ + | Ray Arachelian |Emptiness is loneliness, and loneliness| _ |>
\|/ |sunder@dorsai.org|is cleanliness and cleanliness is god-| \ |
<--+-->| |liness and god is empty, just like me,| \|
/|\ | Just Say |intoxicated with the maddness, I'm in| <|\
+ v + | "No" to the NSA!|love with my sadness. (Pumpkins/Zero)| <| n
===================http://www.dorsai.org/~sunder/=========================
Return to February 1996
Return to “Tony Iannotti <tony@secapl.com>”