1996-02-24 - Re: Remailers, Feb

Header Data

From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0cb6142ab07f25ad24db068130b8b5139e701a0cb88fc484c93c50a2d5324114
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960223053212.0069bd94@mail.aracnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-24 00:17:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 08:17:56 +0800

Raw message

From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 08:17:56 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailers, Feb
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960223053212.0069bd94@mail.aracnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:07 PM 2/22/96 -0500, Bryan Strawser <bstrawse@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
wrote:

>The differences here are because gondolin.org had serious DNS problems
>in January that caused alot of mail to be bounced.  Those problems were
>rectified.. hence our traffic flows now...

Thank you, Bryan! This is _precisely_ the kind of info I'm interested in.

>The latency differences are normal for gondolin because we are not on the
>net, we get our mail via UUCP one hop away from the internet itself.  
>Since our polling is fairly irregular, our latency will move up and down 
>from month to month.

Makes sense. And I don't particularly care about variability as long as I
have a sense of the boundaries. Which my tests define for me. :-)

-- 
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce






Thread