From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0ea482741b0f996e61a9ad4b3208319619f037378d8b56c31c195e1280096041
Message ID: <199602020749.CAA10281@UNiX.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-02 15:59:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:59:29 +0800
From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:59:29 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Telecom Bill may makes abortion talke illegal on the net...
Message-ID: <199602020749.CAA10281@UNiX.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu> wrote:
>Sec. 507 of the Telecom Bill Ammends Section 1462 of title 18 of the U.S.
>Code (Chapter 71), in ways which may make sending the following over the
>Internet illegal:
[..]
> o any information telling about how to obtain or make abortions and
> drugs, or obtaining or making anything that is for indecent or immoral
^^^^^
> use
So the PharmWeb and any discussion of pharamacology would be illegal?
Or does that soley apply to abortion drugs? Immoral is a pretty vague
word legally...
[..]
> (a) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy book, pamphlet, picture,
>motion-picture film, paper, letter, writing, print, or other matter of
>indecent character; or
So much for good foreign films...
> (b) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy phonograph recording,
>electrical transcription, or other article or thing capable of producing
>sound; or
Whoopie cuishins would be illegal.
[..]
Return to February 1996
Return to “wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)”
1996-02-02 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:59:29 +0800) - Re: Telecom Bill may makes abortion talke illegal on the net… - wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)