From: John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>
To: “Simson L. Garfinkel” <simsong@vineyard.net
Message Hash: 10edd0b22fd8f97577afd467416b5ef6d99a464d030075d1b196ad830840093e
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960206020035.00e2bea8@mail.software.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-06 02:48:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 10:48:32 +0800
From: John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 10:48:32 +0800
To: "Simson L. Garfinkel" <simsong@vineyard.net
Subject: Re: FV's blatant double standards
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960206020035.00e2bea8@mail.software.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 08:39 PM 2/5/96 -0500, Simson L. Garfinkel wrote:
>Yes, clearly if you are not concerned about missing 50-75% of First Virtual's
>users, this attack will work just fine.
>-simson
>
>
Who cares - if 25 to 50% of a systems users are
vulnderable doesn't that make it weak ?
John Pettitt, jpp@software.net
VP Engineering, CyberSource Corporation, 415 473 3065
"Technology is a way of organizing the universe so that man
doesn't have to experience it." - Max Frisch
Return to February 1996
Return to “John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>”
1996-02-06 (Tue, 6 Feb 1996 10:48:32 +0800) - Re: FV’s blatant double standards - John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>