1996-02-06 - Re: “PGP-Scape”? (was Re: Our “New Order”)

Header Data

From: Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 15e229a8b3f363f42518f09b08192f7b9411ebc0fb4e078ca90f7522509a6b3c
Message ID: <199602050621.AAA00111@proust.suba.com>
Reply To: <199602050334.WAA17133@UNiX.asb.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-06 00:05:49 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:05:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:05:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "PGP-Scape"? (was Re: Our "New Order")
In-Reply-To: <199602050334.WAA17133@UNiX.asb.com>
Message-ID: <199602050621.AAA00111@proust.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> There's also less worry about secure transactions, since if 
> everything's encrypted it's harder to tell if a transaction is taking 
> place, viewing porno or subversive or religious, literature,  or if
> you're just reading something mundane.

I think I must be missing something here.  Aren't you describing an SSL 
web server?  Different algorithms, but basically the same idea?

> So is fast-than-light travel, but only if it's implemented.

Netscape 2.0 is out for real -- everyone can now pick their certs.  GAK 
just got harder.







Thread