From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 18:16:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9602120919.A6693-0100000@dal1820.computek.net>
Message-ID: <199602160925.EAA10473@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Ed Carp writes:
> If the Feds pulled the plug on the 
> backbone, I can see that there are a lot of people who would drag UUCP 
> and pathalias out of the closet, and the UUCP Mapping Project would live 
> again (hams have their own backbone are would be not as severely affected 
> by the backbone going away).
>
> Not that it wouldn't be hard - but it's doable.

I generally agree with this. But this would not be "the net as I know it"
by any stretch of my imagination. Most of the people who get high priority(*)
in my incoming mail wouldn't start doing UUCP. We could still do some
version of the cpunks list, but at some point I would lose some enthusiasm
for a "means to an end" that is just an end in itself.

(*) or rather, they will when I get my .procmailrc debugged

-Lewis	"You're always disappointed, nothing seems to keep you high -- drive 
	your bargains, push your papers, win your medals, fuck your strangers;
	don't it leave you on the empty side ?"  (Joni Mitchell, 1972)