From: Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 01:20:31 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP & Seamless Pegasus
Message-ID: <199602111642.LAA15731@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

JNPGP also has problems when you're encrypting to an address that isn't 
on the keyring.  It'll barf and send the plaintext message out.  A really 
bad flaw.

It'd be nice to see it or another utility incorporate support for 
anonymous remailers, etc.

IMO, all this will be made much easier when PGP 3.0 exists as a Windows 
or OS/2 DLL.  PGP will probably take off beautifully then.

Rob.

Tripp Hardy wrote:
> 
> Let's not celebrate just yet.  While it is a great improvement, it still =
> causes errors if you try to encrypt an attached file and conventional =
> encryption still doesn't work here.  The only one that is working all =
> around for me is Private Idaho.  We are moving in right direction =
> though.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMR4cbCoZzwIn1bdtAQGi0wF/X9JB0tJU5H0JNf141u+F7Zf1uDNSUnXx
H6STdM5urkwtWvvZCxM9v0lt03D+ro7r
=CSSL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----