From: Peter Monta <pmonta@qualcomm.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1ebc2737e2e2e2e5984a7f8bcf2fd988a61b4c0532a7556c421686a314306412
Message ID: <199602130139.RAA11162@mage.qualcomm.com>
Reply To: <v01530500ad454e6a21aa@[206.86.81.52]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-13 05:43:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:43:04 +0800
From: Peter Monta <pmonta@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:43:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Firewall USA to Firewall China
In-Reply-To: <v01530500ad454e6a21aa@[206.86.81.52]>
Message-ID: <199602130139.RAA11162@mage.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> [ Jim Clark, "Firewall China" ]
>
> A: A lot of people think that's not possible. It's difficult to enforce,
> but it's certainly possible. A corporation has a so-called fire wall -- a
> single point of entry into the corporate net. You can have a country
> that has a single point of entry into its "country net." It's doable. All
> you need, though, is one breach of security, and there's a leak.
>
> A fire wall is a filter -- it filters and doesn't let certain people come in.
> You can only come in if you have the right permission. So you could
> easily set that up so that it would filter out your objectionable
> material.
He seems to be confusing network security with the propagation of content.
A firewall is going to have a lot more trouble filtering dangerous
thoughts than UDP port 1234, unless there are humans in the loop.
Peter Monta pmonta@qualcomm.com
Qualcomm, Inc./Globalstar
Return to February 1996
Return to “sophi@best.com (Greg Kucharo)”