1996-02-09 - Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act

Header Data

From: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Message Hash: 1f371cae2a39b2f9ffc8b100aaae7d41cb67a177ecab4799e449842e76a88581
Message ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960209091108.19343D-100000@nic.wat.hookup.net>
Reply To: <199602090726.XAA27422@blob.best.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-09 14:37:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 22:37:11 +0800

Raw message

From: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 22:37:11 +0800
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Subject: Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act
In-Reply-To: <199602090726.XAA27422@blob.best.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960209091108.19343D-100000@nic.wat.hookup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Thu, 8 Feb 1996 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 5 Feb 1996, Duncan Frissell wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, [a privacy act] would also:
> >> 
> >> *  Require government registration of computers and databases containing
> >> information about people (whether these computers are used by business or
> >> individuals).  This eases regulation of computers and future confiscation.
> 
> At 07:04 PM 2/5/96 -0500, Tim Philp wrote:
> >I don't believe that this follows at all. All that would be required 
> >would be a statutory obligation to comply with the legislation.
> 
> And how can you enforce this statutory obligation?  Privacy laws 
> against private citizens run into the same problem as drug laws:  
> You need intrusive means to enforce them.
> 
> A law "protecting" privacy would require government supervision 
> of what is on my computer and your computer.  
> 

	Private individuals are not what I was refering to. I am more
concerned about corporations who hold information about me and release it
to the highest bidder. When it comes to individual versus corporate
rights, I am clearly on the side of the individual. 
	It is not unreasonable to expect corporations to comply with 
environmental laws to prevent the poisoning of our air and water. I 
think that it is also not unreasonable to expect that personal 
information that we have to release to participate in society be held in 
secure trust and be used only for the purposes that we released it in the 
first place.
	I have also not suggested some form of prior restraint that would 
require government access to computers. I simply suggest that should a 
violation occur, that I have the right of civil and criminal law as a 
recourse to both compensate me for my loss of privacy as well as deter 
future damage. A company knowing that civil and criminal penalties could 
result from a violation would take extra care to ensure the security of 
my data.
Regards,
Tim Philp

===================================
For PGP Public Key, Send E-mail to:
pgp-public-keys@swissnet.ai.mit.edu
In Subject line type:
GET PHILP
===================================







Thread