From: “A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2318e90b9673789d60dfbce68a278b48f5cca541cf987a9e23bcbde4d8e138c0
Message ID: <960212111330.20218f63@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-12 20:17:26 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 04:17:26 +0800
From: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 04:17:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: V-chips
Message-ID: <960212111330.20218f63@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Bill rote:
>One thing the V-Chip gives us is the argument: Now that parents have the
>ability to control what their children watch, the government should turn
>responsibility over to them and butt out.
Hmmm, thought - network TV is declining badly (I like AMC & Discovery
channel myself). FCC rules are somewhat limiting and 5-year-old mentalities
rarely have much disposable income.
Cable is taking off because FCC restrictions do not apply. Would the
V-chip free the networks to allow *more* S&V^H^H^H"adult content" ? Where
is the lobbying/money coming from ?
Warmly,
Padgett
ps still suspect that both the V-chip and CC are simple chip design changes
that do not need to add any cost.
Return to February 1996
Return to ““A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>”
1996-02-12 (Tue, 13 Feb 1996 04:17:26 +0800) - V-chips - “A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>