1996-02-22 - Re: “and two forms of ID”
Header Data
From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: 2b4bfdfc81f045c57917d02293924e8c59c5c7fb4476b1030a674a6b647bd0a7
Message ID: <v02120d04ad51b2b33a96@[199.0.65.105]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-22 05:45:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:45:11 PST
Raw message
From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:45:11 PST
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: "and two forms of ID"
Message-ID: <v02120d04ad51b2b33a96@[199.0.65.105]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I'm sufficiently impressed with the arguments against name credentials
>that Carl Ellison has made that I'm looking seriously into systems
>that don't do any sort of conventional certificate binding at all...
... and I bet, Wei Dai's contentions to the contrary, that they'll be
*cheaper* to use than those which do certificate binding, all other things
being equal.
Cheers,
Bob Hettinga
-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com)
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"Reality is not optional." --Thomas Sowell
The e$ Home Page: http://thumper.vmeng.com/pub/rah/
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to “Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>”
- Return to “rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)”
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”
- 1996-02-22 (Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:45:11 PST) - Re: “and two forms of ID” - rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
- 1996-02-22 (Thu, 22 Feb 96 00:39:41 PST) - Re: “and two forms of ID” - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
- 1996-02-23 (Sat, 24 Feb 1996 01:04:30 +0800) - Re: “and two forms of ID” - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>