1996-02-19 - Re: Risks of a style anonymizer?

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Deranged Mutant <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
Message Hash: 378fe100f999d32eb0eb0646b6120e1fb0f814a376c00e8e2bdc4f8413bd1c2d
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960218234054.14462B-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <199602190719.CAA04302@UNiX.asb.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-19 07:58:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:58:31 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:58:31 +0800
To: Deranged Mutant <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
Subject: Re: Risks of a style anonymizer?
In-Reply-To: <199602190719.CAA04302@UNiX.asb.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960218234054.14462B-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Deranged Mutant wrote:

> 
> > When did it become the style to have a clause, a colon, and another 
> > clause as the title of things? This seems to be universal in govt and 
> > university and highbrow blue-paper reports nowadays!
> 
> ...always has been in the scientific literature.  Also quite popular 
> in Usenet and mailing list posts.

Not forgetting such mysterious works of science as "Manos: The Hand of Fear"

---
They say in  online country		So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way			Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man		Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA			Which side are you on?
  National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37   APL-CPIO






Thread