From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: Arun Mehta <amehta@doe.ernet.in>
Message Hash: 48985bcf5ecfae778a64f0bdcf89af14031def2060d4e9aaf9c2683dd0fe7948
Message ID: <199602111021.CAA21477@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-11 11:12:55 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 19:12:55 +0800
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 19:12:55 +0800
To: Arun Mehta <amehta@doe.ernet.in>
Subject: Re: China
Message-ID: <199602111021.CAA21477@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 07:18 PM 2/10/96 +0530, you wrote:
> Remember that starting this year, satellites of Iridium and other
>LEO satellite projects will start to go up, spreading bandwidth around
>the world. How will the Chinese government build a firewall against
>satellites? Say, for instance orbiting anonymous remailers with pgp? Will
>happen some day.
Remember that much of censorship, as with cryptography, is economics.
With Iridium satellite time at $3/minute, charged to the recipient,
it's well within the financial means of a Banned Pharmaceutical Wholesaler,
and well outside the financial means of an average Chinese university student,
partly because the Chinese economy has much lower price and wage structures
than the major Western economies do.
On the other hand, renting a few gigabytes per day of satellite broadcast time
to broadcast isn't out of the question, or at least renting a few tens of
megabytes per day wasn't out of the question a couple years ago :-)
On the other hand, as you say, if the Chinese government tries a Tien-an-men
in cyberspace, the students _will_ have better tanks.
#--
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com / billstewart@attmail.com +1-415-442-2215
# http://www.idiom.com/~wcs Pager +1-408-787-1281
Return to February 1996
Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 19:12:55 +0800) - Re: China - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>