From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: 49e516dac53fde6ac0890847746460159f1f059ede568844fde874ed180c664c
Message ID: <QQacwm01548.199602141213@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-14 12:24:44 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 20:24:44 +0800
From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 20:24:44 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQacwm01548.199602141213@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Howdy from Australia.
I am in the process of doing some research for an
article on our present bandwidth difficulties in
Oz.
As a side issue, I wanted to cover the "overhead"
factor inherent in the TCP/IP (v4?) protocol
which I understand is reduced under the proposed IPv.6 protocol.
I'd also like to discuss the "unfriendly" manner in which
web browsers such as Netscape hog resources by sending multiple
port access requests.
Can anyone point me towards recent papers which deal with these
issues?
TIA
Mark
___
Mark Neely - accessnt@ozemail.com.au
Lawyer, Professional Cynic
Author: Australian Beginner's Guide to the Internet
Work-in-Progress: Australian Business Guide to the Internet
WWW: http://www.ozemail.com.au/~accessnt
Return to February 1996
Return to “owner-cypherpunks@toad.com”
1996-02-14 (Wed, 14 Feb 1996 20:24:44 +0800) - No Subject - owner-cypherpunks@toad.com