From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:52:08 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: IPG hoax?
Message-ID: <199602220409.XAA17058@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Wink Junior wrote:
> I must admit that after the first day I've been wondering if this whole
> IPG thing isn't some kind of deep troll or early April Fool's joke.  
> anyone actually spoken on the phone with IPG or confirmed their existence
> in any way?  For the record, I'd like to state that I saw their ad [..]

Been wondering the same thing. The noise generated by this is awfully
suspicious.  It's also rather suspicious that a couple of my posts here
have mysteriously not showed up in the archives, although I've received
replies to them (but that's another issue altogether).
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMSvslCoZzwIn1bdtAQGomgF/ckqMkUKfMmmkkz9EoadDUYetwmZHedSY
RYSEAo/sTtXdBzgbKEEOTj20ZA7z5O72
=Ar7E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----