From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 11:26:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: just repeating
Message-ID: <199602090312.WAA10037@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



In response to the several mail messages I got asking why I'd posted
my "robot" message here, I just want to say yet again that Ed Carp was
the one who forward it to cypherpunks. The mail headers in the
message, which I reproduce below, make this obvious.  The mail went
from me to Carp, with appropriate "for" portions of the Received:
headers indicating that the mail was destined for him, and somehow
mysteriously moved from Carp's machine to toad.com -- the only
possible source being Ed forwarding the thing since his name was all
over the previous hops. Don't blame me, folks.

Now, can we get back to cryptography?  Pretty-please?

Perry

Received: from toad.com by geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) with SMTP id UAA13412; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 20:41:19 -0500
Received: by toad.com id AA13518; Thu, 8 Feb 96 17:33:50 PST
Received: from dal1820.computek.net by toad.com id AA13512; Thu, 8 Feb 96 17:33:36 PST
Received: (from erc@localhost) by dal1820.computek.net (8.7/8.6.10) id UAA24985 for cypherpunks@toad.com; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 20:33:49 -0500
Received: by dal1820.computek.net (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #52)
	id m0tkcB9-0009AzC; Thu, 8 Feb 96 14:38 EST
Received: from mail6.netcom.com (ecarp@mail6.netcom.com [192.100.81.142]) by dal1820.computek.net (8.7/8.6.10) with SMTP id OAA29375 for <erc@dal1820.computek.net>; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 14:38:49 -0500
Received: by mail6.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
	id LAA28210; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 11:37:54 -0800
Received: from jekyll.piermont.com by mail6 (8.6.12/Netcom)
	id LAA28165; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 11:37:44 -0800
Received: from localhost (perry@localhost) by jekyll.piermont.com (8.7.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA08993 for <ecarp@netcom.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 14:35:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199602081935.OAA08993@jekyll.piermont.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: jekyll.piermont.com: Host perry@localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: ecarp@netcom.com
From: "Perry's Mail Filter" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 08 Feb 1996 13:29:41 CST."
             <199602081929.OAA28586@dal1820.computek.net> 
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1996 14:35:10 -0500
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk
X-UIDL: 823831065.014


I am sorry, but your message with the Subject:

	Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) 

was rejected by Perry Metzger's mail filter and will not be read by
him. This is likely because Perry decided to place you on his reject
list. Perry tends to clean out his filter lists every six months, so
you may be able to send him electronic mail again sometime in the
future.

If you absolutely need to contact Perry, please use means other than
electronic mail, or ask a third party to contact him on your behalf.

You will not receive further copies of this notice.

Perry's Mail Filter