1996-02-21 - No Subject

Header Data

From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: 64c560af87e487b750f7b864e609e25f10e71a6bc61e5ae9d62edb98d5588cd1
Message ID: <QQadvx20116.199602210925@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-21 09:27:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 17:27:36 +0800

Raw message

From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 17:27:36 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQadvx20116.199602210925@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 06:10 PM 2/20/96 -0600, you wrote:
>>  ** fairly remarkable coincidences.  Or is it that great minds
>>  think alike?
>
>heh, actually the Elementrix POTP sounds like plaintext-driven autokey  
>cipher and probably wouldn't be offensive if they weren't touting it as a  
>'OTP'...
>

Yes, that's true, but they also allude to "a large number of randomly
spinning dice" [rotors?] of which some are selected by contents [perhaps]
the autokey stream.  This from a discussion held with the POTP people.  The
allusion to the numerous 'dice' is what suggested to me a similarity with
the new [unknown but perfect, of course] system.  The autokey of POTP was
supposedly only part of the scheme....







Thread