1996-02-20 - Re: Remailers not heard from; info?

Header Data

From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 66544e4adb333ef15f9ba5a927a2da09bfd91c289906128289db50ed576a6beb
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960220054841.006fbd60@mail.aracnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-20 07:32:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:32:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:32:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailers not heard from; info?
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960220054841.006fbd60@mail.aracnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 02:39 PM 2/19/96 -0800, Raph Levien <raph@kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

>   This is simply the "cut" feature of remailers, which is already
>implemented.

Right you are. I posted without thinking, and deserve the RTFM here.

>while. There may be publicly known functioning remailers which are not
>on my list, but I rather tend to doubt it.

Since I'm getting my list of remailers from you :-), I don't know about them
either.

I really wish I could get a lead on...well, I just put all that in a post to
Tim May, no need to duplicate it all. I'll cheerfully accept both info and
pointers to info for thsoe questions, though.

-- 
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce






Thread