From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: 6a61c21d3bb04e2f234a28648a559348cac3d869e831aac8d4a3c25d2c56c60a
Message ID: <QQachb24539.199602100753@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-10 08:00:02 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:00:02 +0800
From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:00:02 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQachb24539.199602100753@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 06:28 AM 2/9/96 -0500, Duncan wrote, regarding the appallingly
invasive British Privacy Act:
>Computer bureaux which process personal data for others or allow data users
>to process personal data on their computers must also register. Their
>register entries will contain only their name and address.
>
>Data users and computer bureaux who should register but do not, are
>committing a criminal offence, as are those operating outside the
>descriptions contained in their register entries. In these cases the
>Registrar regularly prosecutes. The penalty for non-registration can be a
>fine of up to =A35,000 plus costs in the Magistrates Courts, or an=
unlimited
>fine in the Higher Courts."
Ouch - does this mean that if you offer shell accounts, you either have
to contractually limit the processing your users may do, or be fined
as a criminal for not registering?
#--
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com / billstewart@attmail.com=
+1-415-442-2215
# http://www.idiom.com/~wcs
Return to February 1996
Return to “owner-cypherpunks@toad.com”
1996-02-10 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:00:02 +0800) - No Subject - owner-cypherpunks@toad.com