1996-02-04 - Re: RC2 technical questions

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: mab@crypto.com (Matt Blaze)
Message Hash: 759ae0500d75676337f80965807cfde30373c6446f22fa5b8e5d4ac828bfed23
Message ID: <199602041859.KAA09877@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <199602040753.CAA27660@crypto.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-04 19:48:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 03:48:31 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 03:48:31 +0800
To: mab@crypto.com (Matt Blaze)
Subject: Re: RC2 technical questions
In-Reply-To: <199602040753.CAA27660@crypto.com>
Message-ID: <199602041859.KAA09877@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> I'm confused by these two messages, as a non-lawyer (but I realize you're
> also a non-lawyer).  How can RSADSI, on the one hand, expect to be able

	Giving Bob the benefit of the doubt here, I'm assuming that he
passed on the legal warning as a service to his employer, but he made
his post talking about RC2's technical strengths as an individual, not
speaking for his employer.

-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.org





Thread