1996-02-04 - Re: RC2 technical questions
Header Data
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: mab@crypto.com (Matt Blaze)
Message Hash: 759ae0500d75676337f80965807cfde30373c6446f22fa5b8e5d4ac828bfed23
Message ID: <199602041859.KAA09877@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <199602040753.CAA27660@crypto.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-04 19:48:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 03:48:31 +0800
Raw message
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 03:48:31 +0800
To: mab@crypto.com (Matt Blaze)
Subject: Re: RC2 technical questions
In-Reply-To: <199602040753.CAA27660@crypto.com>
Message-ID: <199602041859.KAA09877@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
> I'm confused by these two messages, as a non-lawyer (but I realize you're
> also a non-lawyer). How can RSADSI, on the one hand, expect to be able
Giving Bob the benefit of the doubt here, I'm assuming that he
passed on the legal warning as a service to his employer, but he made
his post talking about RC2's technical strengths as an individual, not
speaking for his employer.
--
Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to ““baldwin” <baldwin@RSA.COM (Robert W. Baldwin)>”
- Return to “Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>”
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”
- 1996-02-02 (Sat, 3 Feb 1996 02:52:35 +0800) - RC2 technical questions - “baldwin” <baldwin@RSA.COM (Robert W. Baldwin)>
- 1996-02-04 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 21:24:18 +0800) - Re: RC2 technical questions - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
- 1996-02-04 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 03:48:31 +0800) - Re: RC2 technical questions - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
- 1996-02-04 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 21:24:18 +0800) - Re: RC2 technical questions - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>