From: walter@cithe302.cithep.caltech.edu (Chris Walter)
To: mlist-cypherpunks@nntp-server.caltech.edu
Message Hash: 7a93861e2c71e2912fe512322798d1d30a8509023e5e16c50099e9d02012fa31
Message ID: <WALTER.96Feb16132444@cithe302.cithep.caltech.edu>
Reply To: <199602161118.GAA10682@opine.cs.umass.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-17 00:04:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 08:04:51 +0800
From: walter@cithe302.cithep.caltech.edu (Chris Walter)
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 08:04:51 +0800
To: mlist-cypherpunks@nntp-server.caltech.edu
Subject: Re: [NOISE] Patents and Trademarks invalid
In-Reply-To: <199602161118.GAA10682@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Message-ID: <WALTER.96Feb16132444@cithe302.cithep.caltech.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <199602161118.GAA10682@opine.cs.umass.edu> lmccarth@cs.umass.edu writes:
Zachary Amsden writes:
> (please don't e-mail me about this - I have enough e-mail already.
> Post instead)
I'm confused. Instead of you alone getting a copy of every reply, you'd
prefer the scenario where you get a copy of every reply, and so does
everyone else on the cypherpunks list, because _you_ get too much mail ?
How does this scheme reduce the amount of email you get ? Are you not in
fact subscribed to cypherpunks ?
I suspect that he (like me) reads cypherpunks in News. Here at
Caltech anyway the mailing list is gated into our NNTP news service.
This is a big improvement over having mailing list stuff in your normal
mail box.
-Chris
walter@cithe501.cithep.caltech.edu
Return to February 1996
Return to “Zachary R Amsden <amsden+@andrew.cmu.edu>”