From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Message Hash: 7ef9c320e3fb250305a9cf556f7fee50280416976328d8d2d90ee5323b25f671
Message ID: <9601310353.AA19147@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-01 19:05:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 03:05:37 +0800
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 03:05:37 +0800
To: bal@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes
Message-ID: <9601310353.AA19147@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Thanks for the explanation -- in all my discussion with RSA and
explanation to our lawyers I was thinking strictly API. Your
quote of the RSAREF license says they won't refuse anythign reasonable,
and one would be hard-pressed to say that changing keysize for something
already not exportable isn't reasonable.
I'll have to read our license when I get to work tomorrow.
/r$
Return to February 1996
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
1996-02-01 (Fri, 2 Feb 1996 03:05:37 +0800) - Re: Lotus Notes - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>