From: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
To: “‘Vladimir Z. Nuri’” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 889d94d116c5b7c3b6694a67b8ecb0b3ddd3ac8f0fa8c72f4271beeb29294515
Message ID: <01BB00B5.C41C7320@blancw.accessone.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-22 07:28:56 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:28:56 PST
From: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:28:56 PST
To: "'Vladimir Z. Nuri'" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: RE: "consent of the governed"
Message-ID: <01BB00B5.C41C7320@blancw.accessone.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Vladimir Z. Nuri
I was musing over this phrase, "a government rules by consent of the governed" [.......]
does it mean, "majority of the governed?" how exactly is consent expressed?
.......................................................................................
. How exactly is consent extractedH^H^H^H^H^H^ requested?
. When exactly is consent identified?
. How exactly is government applied to the consentees?
(caning, jailing, fines, etc.)
. How exactly do consentors change methodologies when they suddenly realize that they, too, can be subject to their own device?
. Why should non-consenting citizens live with governing methods which in fact conflict with the pursuit of those three human virtues: life, liberty, happiness?
Supposedly, government is devised for ruling the "unruly"; a matter for definition and (dis)agreement which can provide endless hours of amusement for authoritarians, especially in court.
I hear tell that many who are no longer amused are now learning the many uses of encryption. Thus the list.
(end of my comments)
..
Blanc
Return to February 1996
Return to “blanc <blancw@accessone.com>”
1996-02-22 (Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:28:56 PST) - RE: “consent of the governed” - blanc <blancw@accessone.com>