1996-02-10 - Re: Need a “warning” graphic of some kind for CDA

Header Data

From: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
To: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Message Hash: 8b1855a2ec6e588fed755ad27107c7eaf38155611f0c204deb0268a8142d2682
Message ID: <199602101726.LAA00945@grendel.texas.net>
Reply To: <199602090618.WAA24316@ix13.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-10 18:24:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 02:24:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 02:24:49 +0800
To: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: Need a "warning" graphic of some kind for CDA
In-Reply-To: <199602090618.WAA24316@ix13.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199602101726.LAA00945@grendel.texas.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> said:

SS> The Administration has repeatedly stated its belief that those
SS> parts of the bill are unconsitutional, and does not intend to
SS> enforce them.

	Then why didn't the Prez announce that he was ordering the
Justice Department to not defend the CDA provisions, like he did the
AIDS expulsion provision in the military spending bill?

-- 
#include <disclaimer.h>                               /* Sten Drescher */
Unsolicited email advertisements will be proofread for a US$100/page fee.





Thread