From: hoz@univel.telescan.com (rick hoselton)
To: lwp@conch.aa.msen.com
Message Hash: 8ebd431fb8b3370f22bed14642ec48e90b4d51d72f39b47b08207b1041523b19
Message ID: <9602152017.AA17834@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-16 03:36:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 11:36:19 +0800
From: hoz@univel.telescan.com (rick hoselton)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 11:36:19 +0800
To: lwp@conch.aa.msen.com
Subject: Re: Using lasers to communicate
Message-ID: <9602152017.AA17834@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:38 AM 2/14/96 -0500, you wrote:
>This idea of sending data via laser beams across open spaces has some
>very useful potential. ...
>Eavesdropping and channel-blocking and physical-location-discovery are
>related threats to which most traditional data channels are susceptible.
>Any link which depends on a physical conduit (phone line, fiber, coax)
>is relatively easy to interrupt and to trace to its end points.
>RF links, even with frequency hopping, are subject to triangulation and
>jamming. All these kinds of links can be eavesdropped.
>Point-to-point conduitless laser signalling, as envisioned by "Bill" and
>Tim in their quotes below, eliminates or reduces these threats
Dust will cause diffraction of the beam (at a reduced intensity, of course).
Near the source, a detector tuned narrowly to the wavelength of interest would
probably succeed quickly. If you have a line of sight channel, there are
many other ways to signal that will preserve some deniability.
Rick F. Hoselton (who doesn't claim to present opinions for others)
Return to February 1996
Return to “hoz@univel.telescan.com (rick hoselton)”
1996-02-16 (Fri, 16 Feb 1996 11:36:19 +0800) - Re: Using lasers to communicate - hoz@univel.telescan.com (rick hoselton)