1996-02-21 - Re: Need SSL firewall

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 91b9b666e00d7eebb9bf8b9838c5a5655dbbdbc517625f214b35c480a7fcb92a
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960220204419.17944C-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <199602202203.RAA08526@bb.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-21 04:47:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 20:47:19 PST

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 20:47:19 PST
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Need SSL firewall
In-Reply-To: <199602202203.RAA08526@bb.hks.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960220204419.17944C-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Can't you just run a dumb TCP relay? 

I used to have one somewhere, but I can't remember if I solarified it to 
run with multi-threading. I can try and dig it up, but it'd probably be 
faster for you to rewrite from scratch. I also have a ssl proxy for the 
client side which I wrote to demo the MITM attack, but that doesn't sound 
like what you need.

Simon

On Tue, 20 Feb 1996, Lucky Green wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> I need firewall software, preferably for free and running on an x86, that
> allows me to place an SSL webserver behind the firewall.
> 
> Any pointers?
> 
> TIA,
> 
> - -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
>    PGP encrypted mail preferred.
> 
> 
> - ---
> [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
> means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
> signature and forwarded.]
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
> 
> iQBFAwUBMSpFICoZzwIn1bdtAQF3YgGAnt2V+2sTgv7cHDu0k3HZ/664sFbYsu9V
> 4sWnsBNuJoMRVlG4RbxE/iERpu0nR6ZF
> =kPCC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 

---
They say in  online country             So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way                  Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man           Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA                   Which side are you on?
  National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37   APL-CPIO






Thread