1996-02-15 - Re: Netscrape’s Cookies

Header Data

From: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 942b8a32b8e0670794642c3f3097040e5feab651c9c8237479009ede2f2fd2a2
Message ID: <9602151600.AA03535@cti02.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-15 20:33:25 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 04:33:25 +0800

Raw message

From: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 04:33:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscrape's Cookies
Message-ID: <9602151600.AA03535@cti02.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com> said:

>The best answer would probably be to use the kind of pop-up messages you 
>get when you're going to submit a secure or insecure form.  "You're about 
>to send a cookie back to a web server, continue or abandon?"  "You're 
>about to send mail from a web page, do you want to do that?"  Give people 
>the ability to turn the messages off -- that way functionality isn't 
>impaired.

I find that a very good solution providing that the browser say:
>"You're about to send a cookie...."
Here, I would add:
"... that contain the following information:"

(information list)

"... back to a web server, continue or abandon?"

Otherwise, it not as worse, but still in the same spirit as to 
sign a blank check to a stranger...

( I am telling you... it's been *at least* a million years that
I did not exagerate! :)


Regards to the vast majority of CPunk

JFA
**** NEW PGP 2.6.2 KEY *********

2048 bits Key ID:24201BA1 1996/02/13 Jean-Francois Avon <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Key fingerprint =  23 B6 24 31 86 67 FB 35  C7 A7 AF 12 A1 61 E9 3D 


**** OLD KEY: DO NOT USE ANYMORE UNLESS FOR VERIFYING SIGNATURES ****

1024 bits Key ID:57214AED 1995/10/04 Jean-Francois Avon <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Key fingerprint =  84 96 76 AE EB 7C AB 15  88 47 87 B0 18 31 74 9F 






Thread