1996-02-13 - Re:
Header Data
From: lull@acm.org (John Lull)
To: PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com
Message Hash: 9895b8744ee5927cd17c843a7545ada4abb71e06873fef093ea6d44c8050f1af
Message ID: <312026a9.495564@smtp.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <960212134104.2021ab25@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-13 08:37:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 16:37:13 +0800
Raw message
From: lull@acm.org (John Lull)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 16:37:13 +0800
To: PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com
Subject: Re:
In-Reply-To: <960212134104.2021ab25@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
Message-ID: <312026a9.495564@smtp.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 12 Feb 1996 13:41:04 -0500 (EST), Padgett wrote:
> If it were properly and legally decided that communications
> with anon.penet.fi is against "national interest" then the sovereign has
> not only the "right" but the *duty* to block/monitor such communications.
Bullpuckey. One could just as legitimately say:
"If it were properly and legally decided that publication of the
Los Angeles Times is against "national interest" then the sovereign
has not only the "right" but the *duty* to block such publication."
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to ““A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>”
- Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
Return to “lull@acm.org (John Lull)”
- 1996-02-13 (Tue, 13 Feb 1996 14:04:11 +0800) - No Subject - “A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
- 1996-02-13 (Tue, 13 Feb 1996 16:37:13 +0800) - Re: - lull@acm.org (John Lull)
- 1996-02-14 (Wed, 14 Feb 1996 18:13:58 +0800) - Re: your mail - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>