From: Steven Levy <steven@echonyc.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 00:39:51 +0800
To: Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
Subject: Re: A Sign of the Future
In-Reply-To: <199602050625.AAA00118@proust.suba.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960205105408.18342B-100000@echonyc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Give me a break.  I do not work for Wired but I write for them at times, 
and most often my subject is crypto related. I can tell you for a fact 
that there is no anti-cypherpunk policy there. I have a long article that 
deals in part with cypherpunk-related cryptanlysis in the March issue and 
I was, as is always the case, left to make my own editorial judgement.

On Mon, 5 Feb 1996, Alex Strasheim wrote:

> >     Concerns about privacy and anonymity are outdated. Cypherpunks 
> >     think they are rebels with a cause, but they are really senti- 
> >     mentalists. 
> 
> I'm not much for big conspiracy theories, but I like the little ones.
> 
> If this was really in Wired, do you think it was written before or after 
> Tim dissed that magazine here?
> 
> 
>