From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
Message Hash: a3dc0e09797a2afe84508c8840b996352d469f496499fdacb877170c3efb5830
Message ID: <199602091642.IAA19346@shell1.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-09 17:14:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 01:14:09 +0800
From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 01:14:09 +0800
To: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
Subject: Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act
Message-ID: <199602091642.IAA19346@shell1.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>On Thu, 8 Feb 1996 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
>> A law "protecting" privacy would require government supervision
>> of what is on my computer and your computer.
At 09:21 AM 2/9/96 -0500, Tim Philp wrote:
> Private individuals are not what I was refering to. I am more
> concerned about corporations
First: You will not get that, because governments invariably privilege large
businesses above small businesses and individuals. and invariably privilege
old established businesses against new businesses.
Secondly if you were able to get that, it would be even worse than the what
you will actually get.
If you have one law for men who run businesses and one law other folks,
then we have selective enforcement and application of the laws,
that enables governments to act selectively and capriciously.
For example here in California private citizens who attempt to organize
recall elections are often subject to extraordinary and confiscatory fines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to February 1996
Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”
1996-02-09 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 01:14:09 +0800) - Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act - jamesd@echeque.com