1996-02-16 - Re: CDA Yes Votes; Collection

Header Data

From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a9611b5c287001b0c8fb243d37b942110f92b4c464f68f8557510083912e8beb
Message ID: <199602160317.WAA04288@pipe11.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-16 05:50:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 13:50:52 +0800

Raw message

From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 13:50:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CDA Yes Votes; Collection
Message-ID: <199602160317.WAA04288@pipe11.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Feb 09, 1996 05:56:13, 'Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>' wrote: 
 
 
> 
>If you are deeply upset by the high-handed manner in which the legislature

>has screwed around with your life, welcome to the club.  Every bill they 
>pass and every regulation upsets someone just as badly as you are upset. 
>That is why some of us want less legislation and less regulation to
minimize 
>just this sort of human suffering.  Maybe next time those of you who are 
>into "proactive" government will think before you crush other people's
lives. 
> 
>DCF 
> 
 
Isn't it the libertarian types on the list who are into mass killings of
civilians with nukes and the "socialist statists" who tend to oppose it? 
 
How does this square with your view that it is people into "'proactive'
government" who are "crush[ing] other people's lives?" 
 
It seems to me having your city nuked is a tad more likely to produce the
crushing. 
 
Normally, I would not be the first to post this onto cypherpunks, but since
*you* did I'm game for another seemingly off-topic discussion. 
 
--tallpaul





Thread