1996-02-28 - Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)

Header Data

From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
To: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Message Hash: b036de7a5221830568f2816ef38091291f0bb1d3da2483ae70469827f44e04a9
Message ID: <199602282222.RAA15759@UNiX.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-28 23:41:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 07:41:55 +0800

Raw message

From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 07:41:55 +0800
To: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)
Message-ID: <199602282222.RAA15759@UNiX.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU> writes:

> > And, what does this have to do with ViaCrypt PGP 4.0? Would it be 3.0 
> > compatible or is it something entirely different?
> 
> I dont know.  I dont work for ViaCrypt, and they have been fairly
> secretive in their work.  For all I know, they've made ViaCrypt PGP
> 4.0 completely incompatible with PGP 2.6.2 and PGP3.

I would have thought you and Colin would have some communication with 
Phil regarding PGP3, since PGP is his trademark.

The web page referred to it as being in beta, so maybe they are 
working with the old specs... could also be that they completely 
rewrote and improved on the old version.

(Of course if I have questions I should address them to ViaCrypt...)


 
Rob. 

---
Send a blank message with the subject "send pgp-key" (not in
quotes) to <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com> for a copy of my PGP key.





Thread