From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b182bac9c73484c462ea1248c4d0efde6bfc36885d119cee46d758440c3fc161
Message ID: <Bs96iD15w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199602120410.UAA15696@netcom7.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-12 17:11:54 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 01:11:54 +0800
From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 01:11:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: China
In-Reply-To: <199602120410.UAA15696@netcom7.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Bs96iD15w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz) writes:
> Back in the really dark ages, we used acoustic couplers (300 b/s max) which
> held a telephone handset, so there was no direct connection to the
> telephone lines. The phone company asserted that they were also illegal,
> but their argument was kind of weak!
I used acoustic couplers. My first modem was 110 bps, and when we got 300 bps,
it seems so fast in comparison... And then 1200 bps seemed even faster.
Acoustic couplers are still useful if you travel to places where there are
no rj11 connectors.
I recall that AT&T's argument against connecting any kind of user equipment to
their lines was that it might electrocute one of their workers.
I recall that recently in Germany one could not have a modem without some
kind of licence from DT - has it changed?
Personal computers, modems, and phone lines are ubiquitous in the U.S. and
most other developed countries. I suspect that modems may be rare enough in
China for the government to regulate their possession, using any silly excuse.
---
Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
Return to February 1996
Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”