1996-02-20 - Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?

Header Data

From: don@cs.byu.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b8482ea3f9af0bcc9bfce5a325188ebc339aeeffc2b489095c99b399f4d2b39d
Message ID: <199602200823.BAA00562@wero.cs.byu.edu>
Reply To: <199602200645.HAA00901@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-20 09:19:45 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:19:45 +0800

Raw message

From: don@cs.byu.edu
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:19:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?
In-Reply-To: <199602200645.HAA00901@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <199602200823.BAA00562@wero.cs.byu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>   With the additional nym servers coming on the scene comes the 
> question of whether or not to "claim" our alpha.c2 nym on the other 
> ones, too.  E.g., if we are foobar@alpha.c2.org, should we also become 
> foobar@nym.gondolin.org and foobar@nym.alias.net, too?

*shrug* sounds good

> an oversimplified scenario would be if an attacker sends a message to 
> all three nyms, then watches three PGP conventionally encrypted 
> messages arrive in our mailbox.)
> 
>   A "safer" way would be to have the other two nyms have a fake 
> address, but then we couldn't receive mail with it.  A trickier way 
> would be to have the reply block point to alt.anonymous, but then we'd 

Traffic analysis can happen even with only one address. (just spam attack
the one, or whatever)

You can protect yourself somewhat by putting lots of latency into your reply
block, including random. You could have one nym point to another.

ObMindWandering
Since expiration dates were "supposed" to be added to type I, and there's at
least some spam-detection code, why not add "Hi, I'm reply block #XYZ. Watch
for spam attacks from me." warnings inside the reply block. (To be lost on
the next hop, of course)

If good spam-detection code ever catches on in type I, it would be nice to be
able to trigger it yourself. 

ObSnakeOil: Post your source code or go away, you're wasting bandwidth.

ObNoiseInGeneral: skipping it in leaps and bounds. MUCH quieter. =)
- -- 
<don@cs.byu.edu>           fRee cRyPTo!   jOin the hUnt or BE tHe PrEY
PGP key - http://students.cs.byu.edu/~don   or PubKey servers (0x994b8f39)
  June 7&14, 1995: 1st amendment repealed.  Junk mail to root@fryser.dk.net
* This user insured by the Smith, Wesson, & Zimmermann insurance company *

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQB1AwUBMSmE/cLa+QKZS485AQHbigL+Ja1krN2TUFyR+aFR6C0wI5zj4160Iz0q
0tLKSA7X+px+lUwCLdRuEk4wskcNhXFP5ESpCxpQKw2CZRjNlJ4vZA54wE9PBlxf
ibR4ZpktxfFsYr+rkdwt0JWUj/+65d6P
=Pwji
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread