From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bdca7e64c902c7a08e5aa1dca1454c7b31c6d2c5e183875381fa6e3aa99f6be8
Message ID: <199602202023.VAA26697@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-21 03:34:37 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:34:37 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:34:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199602202023.VAA26697@utopia.hacktic.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
::
Subject: Re: List of reliable remailers
On Mon, 19 Feb 1996 06:50:11 -0800, Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
wrote:
> I operate a remailer pinging service which collects detailed
>information about remailer features and reliability.
[snip]
What does it mean if a certain remailer is *not* shown on the current
list? Is it down? Or simply not tested?
Return to February 1996
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
1996-02-21 (Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:34:37 +0800) - No Subject - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)