1996-02-11 - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bee393b8918051deab4c740565560a5eae402ae63b0d65d54532460e7a1f20f0
Message ID: <199602111454.JAA24610@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-11 15:20:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 23:20:58 +0800

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 23:20:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
Message-ID: <199602111454.JAA24610@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


It's hard to tell the difference between "Assasination 
Politics" and government-sponsored provocateurism, a 
well-documented practice to stigmatize anarchical and 
anti-authoritarian ventures.


However, it takes guts and thick skin to advocate overthrow of 
authority, knowing that reasonable people will think you're a 
nut seeking celebrity martyrdom.


Happily for the careers of agent-and-anarchist back-stabbing 
back-scratchers, there is no easy way to know for sure which is 
which, or even if there's any difference when the media 
juggernauts are provocateuring both roles for melodramatic 
infotainment.












Thread