From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 07:38:41 +0800
To: declan+@CMU.EDU
Subject: Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96)
Message-ID: <01I18USFWHX0A0V2IC@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"declan+@CMU.EDU"  "Declan B. McCullagh" 15-FEB-1996 01:33:25.17

>Since you don't understand the way Federal criminal charges work,
>there's no reason I should take your argument seriously. (Hint: The
>*U.S. Attorney*, or an AUSA, files charges, not you, me, or a random
>"athiest.")

	How about a lawsuit by the atheist against the site? Since the CDA
claims that such material is harmful, and tries to make it illegal, such a
lawsuit would appear to have grounds - especially if the atheist has a child
that is "surfing the Net." Now, they're unlikely to _win_, but the atheist
can cost them some money _and_ make the CDA look stupid. If I were in the
American Atheist Foundation or some such, I'd do such a lawsuit against a
Christian Right organization that had supported the CDA.
	Of course, the selective enforcement will be a good argument in favor
of the law being unconstitutional.
	Crypto relevance? Criminal laws aren't the only things that a
crypto-anarchial system will make less effective. Civil lawsuits (under things
like libel) also will be. I'd call this a good change.
	-Allen