From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 04:06:06 +0800
To: "David K. Merriman" <merriman@arn.net>
Subject: Re: Need a "warning" graphic of some kind for CDA
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960209112844.0068f1a8@arn.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960211020941.4468A-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, David K. Merriman wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> At 08:27 AM 02/9/96 -0800, Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> wrote:
> > The Administration has repeatedly stated its belief that those parts of 
> >the bill are unconsitutional, and does not intend to enforce them. 
> 
> So why the fornicate did they include them? What's the point of passing laws that they say they're not going to enforce, unless it's either to enforce them later, or soften up the public for something _slightly_ more tolerable later.

The Administration did not include those provisions.  Ignorant Members of 
Congress did.

EBD