1996-02-05 - Re: Encryption and Backups

Header Data

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
To: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Message Hash: dcc63c3bdb62bcc37b0b25e5a4c80fe03ebf38669aaa1effb1d3e1c0c91966df
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960204231725.439I-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960204221301.0093a448@mail.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-05 04:44:18 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 12:44:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 12:44:18 +0800
To: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Subject: Re: Encryption and Backups
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960204221301.0093a448@mail.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960204231725.439I-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 4 Feb 1996, Alan Olsen wrote:

> Something that I have not seen addressed is the need for strong encryption
> in backup software.
> 
> Most backup software has an "encryption" option, but I have seen few that
> have anything resembling strong encryption.  Furthermore, I have seen no
> real push for strong encryption for backups at all.
> ... 
> Might be an idea for a product there...  (And you can bet law enforcement
> would throw a hissy fit about its existence.)

Indeed.  Many on the law enforcement/prosecution side of the key escrow 
debate are more concerned about encryption of files and backup than they 
are about encrypted email ... 

EBD

> Alan Olsen -- alano@teleport.com -- Contract Web Design & Instruction





Thread