From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ecce53c3f9c50efaa5dd1a2db5e6cb98eab16890fee4fb75f37769c0b0177cae
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960223034206.00686e9c@mail.aracnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-23 23:05:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 07:05:15 +0800
From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 07:05:15 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Remailers, Feb
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960223034206.00686e9c@mail.aracnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've just finished my monthly round of type I remailer testing. This test
doesn't include remailers announced after I started; they'll be inclued next
month. (Also coming in March will be tests of at least one other nym server.)
As in January, I sent posts from my PPP account here (at Aracnet, this time,
rather than Teleport) through a given remailer to an account at alpha.c2.org,
then back through the remailer to me. This is, by design, a very different
sort of test than remailer pinging and the like; in the number of hops and
chances for things to go wrong, I think it reflects actual usage much more
closely.
Trip time is the interval from being posted to mail.aracnet.com to arriving
in my mailbox there. All times are given in hours:minutes. Posts were made at
all times of day. Unsurprisingly, those made late at night (particularly in
the midnight-to-6 am range) returned most quickly.
I've included the January figures for comparison persons. I remain curious
about the differences and eager to find an explanation.
REMAILER FAILURES AVERAGE MINIMUM MAXIMUM
hfinney@shell.portal.com
February 00 00:45 00:35 01:00
January 00 00:08 00:02 00:38
hal@alumni.caltech.edu
February 00 00:46 00:35 01:00
January 00 00:09 00:06 00:12
homer@rahul.net
February 00 00:50 00:37 01:08
January 00 00:06 00:03 00:14
remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl
February 00 01:10 00:47 02:03
January 00 00:19 00:03 01:20
remailer@tjava.com
February 00 001:47 00:26 05:26
January not tested
mix@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
February 00 01:56 00:31 03:35
January not tested
remailer@replay.com
February 00 03:00 00:51 07:45
January 01 00:31 00:13 01:14
remailer@mockingbird.alias.net
February 00 03:29 00:56 06:35
January not tested
mixmaster@vishnu.alias.net
February 00 04:29 00:40 11:27
January 00 00:56 00:23 02:38
mix@remail.gondolin.org
February 00 06:30 00:40 12:52
January 08 11:37 03:58 18:36
mixmaster@remailer.obscura.com
February 00 06:53 00:55 13:25
January 00 02:36 00:23 06:55
remailer@extropia.wimsey.com
February 00 09:15 01:35 23:50
January 08 01:46 01:19 02:13
amnesia@chardos.connix.com
February 10
January 10
pamphlet@idiom.com
February 10
January not tested
remail@c2.org
February 10
January 02 00:52 00:14 03:00
remailer@bi-node.zerberus.de
February 10
January 00 07:43 00:15 19:54
Mailers reported as down with no expectation of returning:
hroller@c2.org
remailer@armadillo.com
Mailers reported as down with some expectation of returning:
remailer@valhalla.phoenix.net / wmono@spook.alias.net
I'd particularly like to thank the remailer operations who (mostly in private
mail) answered a number of questions of mine.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEPAwUBMS02wn3AXR8sjiylAQEd/gfMD4FdgFNMh69P6nd4xdcPogD26zMi5RwQ
JfraMZqG75ezMq4Z5kr1v5j77vNZZ2Bka5T0mR76TqYSPDzKGturPJNY1bSd7Cbn
xUdpee43uo09+QdVpR/IGPKKjxH8qUhJC4X2WvHDlfTdNRCjItIQF2gkBJPRmknJ
OCnHku/bMBs7sr+7OsQyMwvfQrkxpu3Wh/LYV/+U0vEWnCzFupOHQ9nnu+JSCaUu
naFYlqP6w0Ywl6qeTAvRJPgx+PfVDk4B0WZHnXFi1p9IMDaQ7FysxH1pc2mPkURR
M+rwz1ElfCMoMB4JiF5Y3r1aZAf9ES2HLz1sTcueji2S/g==
=O4Sc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce
Return to February 1996
Return to “Bryan Strawser <bstrawse@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>”