From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 01:07:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [noise] the individual and the tribe
Message-ID: <199602071645.IAA22893@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Rob said:
>> ... in the sense that
>>tribal societies are individualist.

Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada) wrote:
>I absolutely don't agree.  The subordination of the individual to the tribe
>is fundamental of their vision of the world. 

Some tribal societies are individualist, some are not:  Most of the
myths and legends of the Australian Aboriginals have a lone ranger
character as the hero or villain, or at least most of the ones
that I have read feature a person whose life is dramatic or heroic in part
because he is tribeless, perhaps for the same reason as most heroes
in Disney cartoons are orphans.


 Individualism is not about the
>personnal opinions, it is about the vision of Man as an entity in itself, not
>a type of cattle that owe his service to the collectivity of the tribe.
>
>Crypto makes the tribe (and it's sorcerers) loose their grip... :)
>
>JFA
>
>
>
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com