1996-02-23 - Re: “and two forms of ID”

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: f5deacb1de27b8ddc7b4a1e993707726d125efd9bf57db4e7476cfec38f1e990
Message ID: <199602220351.WAA11201@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <ad5121a01002100481f6@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-23 00:57:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 08:57:27 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 08:57:27 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: "and two forms of ID"
In-Reply-To: <ad5121a01002100481f6@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199602220351.WAA11201@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Timothy C. May writes:
> This gets back to the familiar issue of what it is a name credential really
> means, and whether we care.

I'm sufficiently impressed with the arguments against name credentials
that Carl Ellison has made that I'm looking seriously into systems
that don't do any sort of conventional certificate binding at all...

Perry





Thread